Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Event: 2-4pm, 4th February 2017
32 PEOPLE ATTENDED AND COMMENTS WERE MADE ON POST-ITS UNDER THE HEADINGS SHOWN BELOW
Key to response column:
A – already/to be addressed within the NP
B – already being addressed by Parish Council
C – show as potential project in NP
D – comment is unclear – no action
n/a – not applicable to NP – no action
Comments on the Themes, Vision and Objectives
RESPONSE
REASONING/NOTES
1
Priority for the pedestrian please. Irresponsible parking impacts on the most vulnerable in our community
C
Could initiate assessment of whole village traffic management
2
Renewable energy?
D
3
Neighbourhood Plan could bring forward proposal to enhance the Square and deal with eyesore on Alms House Hill
A+C (Square)
B (almshouse)
Square – include in Policy for village assets
Almshouse site – PC already tried with LCC-
4
Speed restrictions needed on Clifford Road
B
PC liaising with LCC
5
Halt sign needed from Bowcliffe Road into Paradise Way. Cars shoot out without stopping
n/a
Already there
6
Don’t incur major expenditure on Senior Citizens Shelter – no justification for it
B
PC gathering views on development
7
Scenario planning for size of buildings, impact to the village from the mix of buildings to help people see the future
A
Comments on Village Assets
8
Doctors surgery
A
Add to village assets policy
9
Cycle paths
A
Include in Sports &leisure policy
10
No spreading of area with more large estates
A
In Housing policy
11
Garden areas
A
In natural environment policy
12
School
A
In assets policy
13
Wildlife area
A
In natural environment policy
14
Green space – but in reality can these be protected/supported?
A
In natural environment policy
Comments on Housing
15
Agree on affordable housing – but no visibility of it to date – price of land is the issue
A
In housing policy
16
Small flats would serve a need and take up less space (not skyscrapers though
A
“
17
More small unit housing – starter homes and retirement friendly
A
“
18
No more large houses
A
“
19
More affordable housing. We are an ageing population! Need young people
A
“
20
No more large development, executive housing. More family homes and homes for elderly
A
“
Comments on Transport
21
Make top of Windmill Road 30mph
B
22
We need 30mph speed restriction as car speed 60mph down and it’s a lit road
D
Not clear where
23
20mph throughout village
C
See comment 1 above
24
More cycle paths
A
Include in Sports &leisure policy
25
Green transport plan for school
n/a
Not in our ‘power’ – school issue
26
Transport to Tadcaster and York
A
In Transport policy
27
Climate change and the impact on Bramham – utter nonsense and only puts money into the pockets of a self serving industry
n/a
28
Public transport links to York are poor
A
In Transport policy
29
Many footpaths in the parish are in poor condition – overgrown etc – who is responsible for these
D
Too vague to address
Comments on Natural Environment
30
Is the beck green area opposite school in Bramham or not?
n/a
No it isn’t – but what’s the relevance/point
31
More grass near Bramham school
D
32
Where does wildlife area fit into this?
A
In Natural environment
33
“Special circumstances” re: development in local green space – what does this mean? (See Dean)
D
Can Dean help?
Comments on Heritage
34
I think the Square heritage – look of – should be preserved
A
Village asset
35
I think the church is a heritage asset
A
“
36
Low Way chimney pots?
A
“
37
Stone posts?
A
Assume mean milestones
38
Concern about Bramham House and Bramham Biggin. Are these non designated heritage assets?
A
Already SHLAA sites
Comments on Projects & Aspirations
39
Develop Pavilion sympathetically for the benefit of the community – events and activities focused on developing and supporting aspirations. Car boot sales and similar events don’t fall into that category
A+B
Already in assets
PC addressed car boot sale issue – allowed 1 per year
40
Consider one way systems especially in older/narrow streets
C
41
Some signs obscured by vegetation
n/a
Too vague to address
42
Playing field not suitable for car boot sales etc
B
See 39 above
43
Capital projects should not process unless adequate revenue support in place
B
PC already considers ongoing maintenance costs of any project
44
Further development on playing field will reduce green space – look at other areas in the village
A
PC has applied for Fields in Trust protection for playing field
45
Car parking at school not required – school should have green travel plan and promote walking
n/a
Not within our ‘power’
46
Old folk’s shelter
A+B
Already an asset – and PC gathering views on development
General comments
47
What has been expenditure to date on fees? Please can this be reported in PC minutes/parish magazine?
Report in Parish Magazine that grant has been obtained – no expenditure from precept – and all payment of fees shown in Parish Council minutes
Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Event: 2-4pm, 4th February 2017
32 PEOPLE ATTENDED AND COMMENTS WERE MADE ON POST-ITS UNDER THE HEADINGS SHOWN BELOW
Key to response column:
A – already/to be addressed within the NP
B – already being addressed by Parish Council
C – show as potential project in NP
D – comment is unclear – no action
n/a – not applicable to NP – no action
Comments on the Themes, Vision and Objectives
RESPONSE
REASONING/NOTES
1
Priority for the pedestrian please. Irresponsible parking impacts on the most vulnerable in our community
C
Could initiate assessment of whole village traffic management
2
Renewable energy?
D
3
Neighbourhood Plan could bring forward proposal to enhance the Square and deal with eyesore on Alms House Hill
A+C (Square)
B (almshouse)
Square – include in Policy for village assets
Almshouse site – PC already tried with LCC-
4
Speed restrictions needed on Clifford Road
B
PC liaising with LCC
5
Halt sign needed from Bowcliffe Road into Paradise Way. Cars shoot out without stopping
n/a
Already there
6
Don’t incur major expenditure on Senior Citizens Shelter – no justification for it
B
PC gathering views on development
7
Scenario planning for size of buildings, impact to the village from the mix of buildings to help people see the future
A
Comments on Village Assets
8
Doctors surgery
A
Add to village assets policy
9
Cycle paths
A
Include in Sports &leisure policy
10
No spreading of area with more large estates
A
In Housing policy
11
Garden areas
A
In natural environment policy
12
School
A
In assets policy
13
Wildlife area
A
In natural environment policy
14
Green space – but in reality can these be protected/supported?
A
In natural environment policy
Comments on Housing
15
Agree on affordable housing – but no visibility of it to date – price of land is the issue
A
In housing policy
16
Small flats would serve a need and take up less space (not skyscrapers though
A
“
17
More small unit housing – starter homes and retirement friendly
A
“
18
No more large houses
A
“
19
More affordable housing. We are an ageing population! Need young people
A
“
20
No more large development, executive housing. More family homes and homes for elderly
A
“
Comments on Transport
21
Make top of Windmill Road 30mph
B
22
We need 30mph speed restriction as car speed 60mph down and it’s a lit road
D
Not clear where
23
20mph throughout village
C
See comment 1 above
24
More cycle paths
A
Include in Sports &leisure policy
25
Green transport plan for school
n/a
Not in our ‘power’ – school issue
26
Transport to Tadcaster and York
A
In Transport policy
27
Climate change and the impact on Bramham – utter nonsense and only puts money into the pockets of a self serving industry
n/a
28
Public transport links to York are poor
A
In Transport policy
29
Many footpaths in the parish are in poor condition – overgrown etc – who is responsible for these
D
Too vague to address
Comments on Natural Environment
30
Is the beck green area opposite school in Bramham or not?
n/a
No it isn’t – but what’s the relevance/point
31
More grass near Bramham school
D
32
Where does wildlife area fit into this?
A
In Natural environment
33
“Special circumstances” re: development in local green space – what does this mean? (See Dean)
D
Can Dean help?
Comments on Heritage
34
I think the Square heritage – look of – should be preserved
A
Village asset
35
I think the church is a heritage asset
A
“
36
Low Way chimney pots?
A
“
37
Stone posts?
A
Assume mean milestones
38
Concern about Bramham House and Bramham Biggin. Are these non designated heritage assets?
A
Already SHLAA sites
Comments on Projects & Aspirations
39
Develop Pavilion sympathetically for the benefit of the community – events and activities focused on developing and supporting aspirations. Car boot sales and similar events don’t fall into that category
A+B
Already in assets
PC addressed car boot sale issue – allowed 1 per year
40
Consider one way systems especially in older/narrow streets
C
41
Some signs obscured by vegetation
n/a
Too vague to address
42
Playing field not suitable for car boot sales etc
B
See 39 above
43
Capital projects should not process unless adequate revenue support in place
B
PC already considers ongoing maintenance costs of any project
44
Further development on playing field will reduce green space – look at other areas in the village
A
PC has applied for Fields in Trust protection for playing field
45
Car parking at school not required – school should have green travel plan and promote walking
n/a
Not within our ‘power’
46
Old folk’s shelter
A+B
Already an asset – and PC gathering views on development
General comments
47
What has been expenditure to date on fees? Please can this be reported in PC minutes/parish magazine?
Report in Parish Magazine that grant has been obtained – no expenditure from precept – and all payment of fees shown in Parish Council minutes